Was Hitler's decision to attack the Soviet Union his greatest military Essay

Was Hitlers decision to attack the Soviet concretion his greatest military failure - hear ExampleThus Operation Barbarossa would be the catalyst that resulted in the collapse of the Third Reich.6 Based on these assessments it is therefore argued that Hitlers attack on the Soviet Union was its greatest military failure. This paper intends to embellish this hypothesis by first evaluating Hitlers conflicting policy and secondly Operation Barbarossa. Hitlers foreign policy will be evaluated first as a means of tying it to the strategies, planning and exertion of Operation Barbarossa. Thirdly, this paper will conduct an analysis of Hitlers attack on the Soviet Union with the objective of determining how Hitlers attack on the Soviet Union ties in with his strategies toward the Allied powers during the s World War. The third part of this paper will analyse what aspects of Operation Barbarossa contributed to its greatest failure. ... Even so, Weinberg informs that Hitler Had a sop upl y formulated set of ideas on major issues of foreign policy, and these ideas were intimately interwoven with his concepts of domestic affairs.8 These clear ideas were founded on the doctrine of race and were predicated on the concept that mans history is more specifically understood by reference to race. More specifically, mans history is tied to the racial components of diametrical societies.9 Prior to taking office, Hitlers doctrine of race underpinnings and its characterization of his foreign policies were obvious in his speeches and writings. For Hitler, Germ whatever had non lost the First World War. Instead, Germany had been backstabbed by Jews those who supported Jews. Jews and their supporters not only had tremendous influence in Germany but besides garnered strength from foreign powers whose victory during the First World War had facilitated the backstabbing.10 It therefore followed that any effective foreign policy was required to facilitate domestic reconfiguration. To this end, according to Weinberg, a nationally cognizant group must assume power and must ruthlessly displace whatever steps toward participatory government that had already occurred in Germany and rearm to provide the tools of an aggressive foreign policy.11 What this meant for Hitler was the formulation of a policy that would require a direct confrontation with France, Germanys perpetual enemy. This policy might also require a coalition with Italy who equally objected to France acquiring European hegemony. Other strategies included annexing Austria and other as yet to be identified territories under a Greater Germany.12 The